The Dinner Test: Chipotle's COO Picks Leaders Over a Meal
Chipotle's COO decides who gets promoted over dinner. Three or four employees, 90 minutes, one night a week, and the numbers say it's working.
Jason Kidd's method, and the Fortune piece that laid it out, opened Episode 68.
Every week Kidd is on the road, he works through about a dozen stores and pulls a handful of employees into a long meal. He's watching for four things: team players, people who own the outcome, people who see problems coming rather than fighting fires, and people who turn up with solutions. Those are the right traits for running a restaurant. Nobody's arguing that part.
The mobility numbers hold up too. Chipotle promoted 23,000 of its roughly 135,000 employees in 2025, and filled every regional VP role from inside along with 85% of GM roles and 83% of field-leader roles. That's moving hard against the market. Gusto has promotion rates at a five-year low of just over 10%, down from 14.5% in mid-2022.
So I wanted to like this, and I don't. Kidd is watching people over time instead of trusting a 30-minute interview, and employees across a lot of locations get real face time with someone who can change their career. Fine. But the test rewards whoever presents well over a meal, on the one night the COO happens to be in town. The quiet high performer never registers. Neither does the person working a shift that didn't line up with the visit, or the employee who tightens up in front of a senior leader and eats in silence.
A company promoting 23,000 people a year clearly isn't running on one executive's dinner reservations. Something else is carrying the weight for the other 22,900-odd, and that's the part Jenni and I kept circling. Nobody knows what it is, including, I'd guess, a lot of Chipotle employees.
Which is where this stops being a nice culture story and becomes a comms problem. The dinner is charming, quotable and easy to repeat, so it becomes the version people believe. Once employees decide promotions run through face time with the boss, you've handed them an explanation for every decision that doesn't go their way.
If you're the person writing the internal version of this, the anecdote is the easy half. Publishing the criteria that apply to everyone who never gets the invitation is the half that keeps it honest.
Also in this episode:
Same logo, opposite career. New Burning Glass Institute research tracked 12 million workers across 1,750 large employers and found an average 81-percentile-point gap between the best and worst roles for promotion inside the same company. At Cigna, actuaries sit in the 99th percentile while business intelligence analysts sit in the 22nd. At Best Buy, home theatre installers reach the 99th and customer service lands in the 31st. Companies invest in what they've decided is the strategic core and treat the rest as overhead, which also means opportunity turns up in unglamorous places: financial managers hit the 99th at Nike and PepsiCo, accountants hit the 99th at John Deere and Caterpillar.
Jenni and I agreed this is an org design and succession problem well before it's a comms problem, but comms is the one holding the mic. The engineer in the 99th percentile and the service rep in the 31st hear the same "we invest in you" line at the same all-hands, and one of them knows better. AI career tools are starting to show candidates role-level promotion and retention percentiles directly, so that promise is about to become fact-checkable against data nobody in comms controls.Gen Z hasn't lost its ambition, it's moved it. Emi Nietfeld's New York Times essay makes the case that titles and dream-employer loyalty are out, and money plus free time are in. Financial independence now outranks marriage and children as a defining goal, respondents put the number for feeling successful near $600,000 a year, three in four want to run their own thing, and not one student she interviewed named a dream employer. She calls it a casino economy, and a campus chaplain sums it up neatly: students no longer ask what they can achieve, they ask what they need to survive.
Jenni and I got into what it means to love your work at all, and how much of our own relationship with work was shaped by the people around us growing up. The purpose-and-belonging playbook was written for a generation that treated work as salvation. Plenty of what still goes out weekly assumes that's the audience.Gartner wants the CEO's AI vision speech off the top. Only 26% of employees say their senior leaders are both competent and trustworthy, and 79% report low trust in how change is handled, according to Gartner's research on AI transformation. Leadership has stopped being the primary source of truth, with employees building their read from Reddit, Blind, Glassdoor and each other. Gartner's advice cuts against instinct: lead with blunt business reality rather than the inspiring future state, track the narratives moving through anonymous forums instead of relying on sentiment surveys, and route the personal upside of AI through managers and peers, because employees hear a promise rather than a vision.
High-trust organisations get more than six times the discretionary effort, and fear of AI-driven job loss can cost a large employer up to $47 million a year in quiet resignations. Jenni's read is that credibility needs several things working at once, and too many leaders are still communicating for themselves rather than for the people they need to reach.
Written by Chuck Gose, founder of ICology.
The Frequency Podcast
Real talk about comms, culture, and employee experience.
Chuck Gose and Jenni Field skip the buzzwords and get straight to what matters. New episodes every week.
Listen & Subscribe